Recommended actions

No repository changes recommended.

Failure patterns

Snake_case export-name mismatches (6 tasks)

• Classification: Model limitation
• Confidence: High
• What the model wrote:
  • export const myProfile = ...
  • export const featuredContent = ...
  • export const openTicket = ...
  • export const windowEvent = ...
  • export const eligibleMember = ...
  • export const sourceView = ...
• What was expected:
  • export const my_profile = ...
  • export const featured_content = ...
  • export const open_ticket = ...
  • export const window_event = ...
  • export const eligible_member = ...
  • export const source_view = ...
• What the error says: schema_parity: failed
• Why this happened: The generated code consistently used camelCase export names where the golden answers used snake_case runtime names. In SpacetimeDB modules, exported reducer/view identifiers are part of the schema surface, so this mismatch breaks parity even when the underlying logic is close.
• Suggested action: None
• Suggested area: None
• Affected tasks: t_023_view_per_user, t_062_semijoin_intersection, t_063_timestamp_window, t_064_index_and_filter, t_066_query_builder_view, t_067_view_primary_key
• AI guidelines gap: Needs manual review

Truncated materialized-aggregate implementation (1 task)

• Classification: Model limitation
• Confidence: Medium
• What the model wrote:
  • function updateSale(ctx: Ctx, id: bigint, category: string, amount: bigint) {
  • applyDelta(ctx, existing.category, -existing.amo
• What was expected:
  • function addToTotal(...) { ... }
  • function removeFromTotal(...) { ... }
  • function upsertSale(...) { ... }
• What the error says: schema_parity: failed
• Why this happened: The generated answer was cut off mid-function, so the reducer logic never reached a complete, parity-matching implementation.
• Suggested action: None
• Suggested area: None
• Affected tasks: t_065_materialized_aggregate
• AI guidelines gap: Needs manual review

Schema-shape drift in the view-primary-key task (1 task)

• Classification: Model limitation
• Confidence: Medium
• What the model wrote:
  • const SourceViewRow = t.row('SourceViewRow', { id: t.u64().primaryKey(), value: t.string(), visible: t.bool() });
  • const sourceRow = table({ name: 'source_row', public: true }, { id: t.u64().primaryKey(), value: t.string(), visible: t.bool().index('btree') });
• What was expected:
  • const SourceViewRow = t.row('SourceViewRow', { id: t.u64().primaryKey(), value: t.string(), visible: t.bool().index('btree') });
  • const sourceRow = table({ name: 'source_row', public: true }, SourceViewRow);
• What the error says: schema_parity: failed
• Why this happened: The model rebuilt the schema manually instead of reusing the shared row type used in the golden answer, producing a different schema shape.
• Suggested action: None
• Suggested area: None
• Affected tasks: t_067_view_primary_key
• AI guidelines gap: Needs manual review