Recommended actions

No repository changes recommended.

Failure patterns

Canonical schema/view naming drifted from the benchmark expectation (2 tasks)

• Classification: Model limitation
• Confidence: Medium
• What the model wrote:
  • name: 'activeAnnouncements'
  • const line_item = table(...)
  • schema({ customer, purchase, line_item })
  • const OrderLineDetailRow = t.row('OrderLineDetailRow', ...)
• What was expected:
  • name: 'active_announcements'
  • const lineItem = table(...)
  • schema({ customer, purchase, lineItem })
  • const OrderLineDetail = t.row('ThreeTableJoinRow', ...)
• What the error says: schema_parity: failed
• Why this happened: The generated modules drifted from the expected canonical names for tables, schema accessors, views, and row types. In the basic view task, the view name used camelCase instead of the expected snake_case database name. In the join task, the schema accessor and row type naming also diverged from the golden answer, which is enough to fail a strict schema-parity scorer.
• Suggested action: None
• Suggested area: None
• Affected tasks: t_022_view_basic, t_061_three_table_join
• AI guidelines gap: Needs manual review